|
Post by Iceman on Apr 28, 2006 19:44:03 GMT -5
Which do you prefer and like watching more? TNA or the WWE?
I prefer watching TNA over the WWE, especially with the new additions they keep adding like: Team 3D, Sting, Norman Smiley, Scott Steiner, Buff Bagwell, Lex Luger, and Rick Steiner.
|
|
|
Post by Scott Joyce on Apr 28, 2006 21:10:29 GMT -5
I think TNA because Vince is for Vince not the fans. TNA is really up and coming in talent and is almost if not surpassing WWE in the talent pool.
|
|
Alpha Clash
Wrestling Announcer
Nothing is impossible. Anything can happen with enough blood, sweat & tears.
Posts: 1,239
|
Post by Alpha Clash on Apr 28, 2006 22:16:20 GMT -5
TNA is a lot better than WWE mainly because of the politics there not being nowhere as bad as in WWE...although I wish Jeff Jarrett would stay out of the world title picture for the next year or so.
|
|
|
Post by Iceman on Apr 28, 2006 23:42:08 GMT -5
I think TNA because Vince is for Vince not the fans. TNA is really up and coming in talent and is almost if not surpassing WWE in the talent pool. Lol, good answer Scotty. Glad you and Alpha are "Pro" TNA and against the "Evil Empire". I do like Jarrett around the Title, he does some good and funny promos at times too, but yeah, he did have the belt for too long, but doesn't have it now, but I would rather see him with it now instead of Mid-Carder Christian. I actually thought Sting would have it by now, but he still only Wrestled 2 times in 3 months for some reason, lol, some things I just don't understand and I guess I never will, lol.
|
|
|
Post by The Showman on Apr 29, 2006 3:17:39 GMT -5
TNA all the way!!
And, don't worry, Sting will be champion before too long.
|
|
|
Post by Iceman on Apr 29, 2006 3:38:51 GMT -5
TNA all the way!! And, don't worry, Sting will be champion before too long. Lol, I hope, think he would look real good with the belt now, far better than a lightweight like Christian. Then next would be Scott Steiner and Buff Bagwell or Rick Steiner as the Tag-Team Champions there, that would be nice, lol.
|
|
|
Post by The Showman on Apr 29, 2006 6:23:04 GMT -5
I'll tell you something, I was becoming so bored with wrestling - and thanks must go to WWE for that - before TNA came along. Now, I actually look FORWARD to watching wrestling again - and thanks must go to TNA for that. I think if Rick Steiner comes in, he'll probably go against Scott. For some reason, and I can't seem to put my finger on it, I just can't see them teaming up again. Luger and Bagwell would make a good tag team I think. Also, I'm wondering who's Sting's choices are going to be next week on Impact!, seeing as Jarret and Steiner turned Luger and Bagwell down. Goldberg maybe???
|
|
3rd Hardy
Wrestling Magazine Writer
Posts: 452
|
Post by 3rd Hardy on Apr 29, 2006 9:18:05 GMT -5
tna still comes across as small time. they need to tour and film in bigger arenas. just start with the ppv's
wwe is still the best
the raw two weeks ago had about 6 funny one liners.
|
|
|
Post by The Showman on Apr 29, 2006 11:36:29 GMT -5
the raw two weeks ago had about 6 funny one liners. Was that the one where Vince and Shane were in the church, looking for God? I admit, that skit was funny. Vince going to make a donation by credit card and asking "what kind of operation are they running here" and his impersonation of Triple H with the water was funny.
|
|
Burnham
Wrestling Manager
S.U.F.C
Posts: 1,934
|
Post by Burnham on Apr 29, 2006 13:13:35 GMT -5
i only say wwe cos i dont watch much tna!
|
|
|
Post by Iceman on Apr 30, 2006 2:13:09 GMT -5
Well that's cool that TNA got you back into Wrestling Showman. They can be pretty entertaining and I'm glad they came along. Oh, and it's gotta be Rick Steiner being Sting's partner don't ya think? Lol.
Missed that WWE skit, sounded pretty good though.
|
|
3rd Hardy
Wrestling Magazine Writer
Posts: 452
|
Post by 3rd Hardy on Apr 30, 2006 5:30:38 GMT -5
i liked the mickey james/trish bit when the boyfriend was gagged and when they asked him who he prefered he said ur both physco biotch es. it got a huge pop from the crowd
|
|
Warrior
Cook for Wrestlers
.:I'm more Ultimaniac than Savage:.
Posts: 81
|
Post by Warrior on May 2, 2006 10:53:32 GMT -5
I wont lie, I do watch both... But have to say, I would probably take TNA quite easily over modern day WWE.
Theres not much I dislike in TNA at this time, but I only watch WWE for a select few workers, those being; JBL, Cap'n Paul, Carlito, Fit Finlay and Boogeyman...
|
|
Meg
Ring Crew
Member since Day 1
Posts: 53
|
Post by Meg on May 3, 2006 20:52:52 GMT -5
I am gonna have to go with WWE, even though they tend to have stupid angles, I still believe that they have some great talent thats fun and entertaining to watch!
|
|