3rd Hardy
Wrestling Magazine Writer
Posts: 452
|
Post by 3rd Hardy on Oct 9, 2007 10:20:41 GMT -5
92 AT WEMBLEY
|
|
Burnham
Wrestling Manager
S.U.F.C
Posts: 1,934
|
Post by Burnham on Oct 11, 2007 5:34:23 GMT -5
agree 1000000% with you there! though the warrior vs savage match went on for ages! lol they need to do a WM there sometime |
|
Diabolo
Wrestling Photographer
Posts: 268
|
Post by Diabolo on Oct 30, 2007 13:01:46 GMT -5
91 or 92. I'd say 92 purely because it was in the UK at wembley tho 91 did have that cracking bout between Bret and Mr Perfect.
|
|
Burnham
Wrestling Manager
S.U.F.C
Posts: 1,934
|
Post by Burnham on Nov 5, 2007 4:29:56 GMT -5
91 was good, but it had that stupid handicap main event
|
|
Oonagoota Solo
Wrestling Fan
Win if you can, lose if you must, but always, always cheat
Posts: 11
|
Post by Oonagoota Solo on Nov 6, 2007 17:53:10 GMT -5
Summerslam 88 was my favourite, i loved the main event and it planted the seeds for the whole classic Mega Powers Explode storyline. Can you believe the made that main event storyline last nearly 12 months from start to finish, you wouldn't get that today!
|
|
Burnham
Wrestling Manager
S.U.F.C
Posts: 1,934
|
Post by Burnham on Nov 8, 2007 4:34:06 GMT -5
no you would get rushed storylines that make no sense
|
|
80s4life
Wrestling Event Security
Posts: 137
|
Post by 80s4life on Nov 20, 2007 13:12:00 GMT -5
Really good question. I wouldn't say '91, because let's face it, other than Bret / Perfect, there wasn't much to write home about, from that fake wedding to the Iraqi storyline handicap main event. I would have to agree with the person that wrote '88 or '92, because they were both based on solid, well-built storylines. If you're arguing '91, then you might as well say '89, because Bret was also involved in another kick-ass match, Hart Foundation vs. Brainbusters.
|
|
Burnham
Wrestling Manager
S.U.F.C
Posts: 1,934
|
Post by Burnham on Dec 3, 2007 9:30:02 GMT -5
ive never seen 88! what was the main event?
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Tie-Dye Dream" Ricky Cool on Dec 4, 2007 14:11:03 GMT -5
Summerslam 88's main event was
The Meger-Bucks (Ted DiBiase & Andre The Giant) w/ Heenan & Virgil
VS
The Meger Powers (Hogan & Savage) w/ Miss Elizabeth
with Jesse "The Body" Ventura as the spechial Guest Reffery.
I'd have to say i'm torn between 88, 92 & Also 95 (even though the Diesel vs King Mable main event was appaling) i thought there were some good matches and the storylines behind them were again both well thought and played out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kevvversion1 on Mar 16, 2008 23:34:10 GMT -5
My favourite Summerslam is 89. Start to finish it was an awesome event, there wasnt one bad match, for entertainment and the fans being right into it, I always enjoy watching this show. Some of the classic matches included Hart Foundation Vs Brainbusters, Ultimate Warrior Vs Ravishing Rick Rude and the main event Hogan and Brutus Beefcake Vs Randy Savage and Zeus. On paper you could say others had a better card, but it's all about what happens on the night. 1992 would be a close 2nd.
|
|
DA NEMISIS
Wrestling Radio Host
Hits Ya Everytime
Posts: 931
|
Post by DA NEMISIS on Mar 18, 2008 18:16:17 GMT -5
didnt mind '93 summerslam.
|
|
|
|
Post by casino on Jul 10, 2008 16:53:43 GMT -5
Got to agree with Summerslam 92. Great atmosphere and fantastic main event.
|
|
